[Info-ingres] Weird problem in Ingres 10

Alex Hanshaw Alex.Hanshaw at actian.com
Thu May 17 14:32:29 UTC 2018 

aborted statements should also appear in auditdb output.

From: info-ingres-bounces at lists.planetingres.org <info-ingres-bounces at lists.planetingres.org> On Behalf Of Martin Bowes
Sent: 17 May 2018 15:00
To: info-ingres at lists.planetingres.org
Subject: Re: [Info-ingres] Weird problem in Ingres 10

Please remove it. You may get a swathe of data but in this case more may shed some light on the issue.

Are there any other processes you know of which are monkeying with the data?

Is there a good reason why there is nojournaling on this table? Can we turn it on ... which will entail backing up the database as well.

Marty

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark [mailto:i at dontgetlotsofspamanymore.net]
Sent: 17 May 2018 14:54
To: info-ingres at lists.planetingres.org<mailto:info-ingres at lists.planetingres.org>
Subject: Re: [Info-ingres] Weird problem in Ingres 10

On Thu, 17 May 2018 13:43:35 +0000, Martin Bowes
<martin.bowes at ndph.ox.ac.uk<mailto:martin.bowes at ndph.ox.ac.uk>> wrote:

>Hi Mark,
>
>I note that you are turning off the sc930 trace with a SET TRACE POINT SC930 0 which is still presumably in your ESQLC script. Sadly I think that is masking what is happening here as on the first occasion we lost nearly two minutes of activity, then over a minute on the second and over 4minutes on the third occasion. Could you please remove that from the script and try again.

I wanted to disable the tracing after the problematic statement had
finished. I can remove this if there may be useful data shown
otherwise.

>If this table is journaled could you please also check with auditdb for an insert of the message_id = ' 100055700000XDBW' record after 10:34:06

The table is not journalled.

>Marty
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Martin Bowes [mailto:martin.bowes at ndph.ox.ac.uk]
>Sent: 17 May 2018 14:31
>To: info-ingres at lists.planetingres.org<mailto:info-ingres at lists.planetingres.org>
>Subject: Re: [Info-ingres] Weird problem in Ingres 10
>
>Whoops sorry, I'll take that back there are 4 queries.
>
>The first and the fourth queries are seemingly identical and the fourth indicates a rowcount 1 on the update.
>
>I'll have a closer look.
>
>Marty
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Martin Bowes [mailto:martin.bowes at ndph.ox.ac.uk]
>Sent: 17 May 2018 14:25
>To: Mark; info-ingres at lists.planetingres.org<mailto:info-ingres at lists.planetingres.org>
>Subject: Re: [Info-ingres] Weird problem in Ingres 10
>
>Hi Mark,
>
>That trace shows three successive update attempts each with a different message_id. The first one updates no rows the others update a single row.
>
>So can you do a:
>select count(*) from db_msg where message_id = ' 100055700000XDBW' and queue <> ' log_20150325' /* rowcount = 0 */
>
>select count(*) from db_msg where message_id = ' 400055700000XDBW' and queue <> ' log_20150325' /* rowcount = 1 */
>
>select count(*) from db_msg where message_id = ' 500055700000XDBW' and queue <> ' log_20150325' /* rowcount = 1 */
>
>Marty
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mark [mailto:i at dontgetlotsofspamanymore.net]
>Sent: 17 May 2018 14:17
>To: info-ingres at lists.planetingres.org<mailto:info-ingres at lists.planetingres.org>
>Subject: Re: [Info-ingres] Weird problem in Ingres 10
>
>On Thu, 17 May 2018 13:03:16 +0000, Martin Bowes
><martin.bowes at ndph.ox.ac.uk<mailto:martin.bowes at ndph.ox.ac.uk>> wrote:
>
>>Sorry, my bad that should have been a line starting: SESSION BEGINS
>>
>>Can you send the update queries and parameters (if any) from the good and bad cases. Those won't show any private data, so it should be cool.
>
>Cheers. I have emailed you the logs.
>
>>Marty
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Mark [mailto:i at dontgetlotsofspamanymore.net]
>>Sent: 17 May 2018 13:51
>>To: info-ingres at lists.planetingres.org<mailto:info-ingres at lists.planetingres.org>
>>Subject: Re: [Info-ingres] Weird problem in Ingres 10
>>
>>On Thu, 17 May 2018 12:35:38 +0000, Martin Bowes
>><martin.bowes at ndph.ox.ac.uk<mailto:martin.bowes at ndph.ox.ac.uk>> wrote:
>>
>>>Going out on a limb here...
>>>
>>>Are we sure the two sessions are working on the same table owned by the same user in the same database as each other?
>>
>>I am only using a single session for this.
>>
>>>In the sc930 trace file can you find the connection information immediately prior to the update code. You are looking for a line like:
>>>BEG 27/03/2018 13:26:07.598545, Database: iidbdb, User: ingres
>>
>>There's nothing like this in the trace files.
>>
>>>You could also check your database and see if there are any duplicates of the table with the query:
>>>Select table_owner from iitables where table_name='YOURTABLE';
>>>
>>>Do that for each table involved in the update.
>>
>>Only 1 row (& only 1 table in the update).
>>
>>>Marty
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Mark [mailto:i at dontgetlotsofspamanymore.net]
>>>Sent: 17 May 2018 13:21
>>>To: info-ingres at lists.planetingres.org<mailto:info-ingres at lists.planetingres.org>
>>>Subject: Re: [Info-ingres] Weird problem in Ingres 10
>>>
>>>On Thu, 17 May 2018 12:06:48 +0000, Martin Bowes
>>><martin.bowes at ndph.ox.ac.uk<mailto:martin.bowes at ndph.ox.ac.uk>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>No error code and with a rowcount of zero means the update is successful, but had no work to do.
>>>>
>>>>I presume there is a where clause in the update and that it looks OK.
>>>
>>>There is a where clause and it does match a record so there is "work
>>>to do".
>>>
>>>>Can you compare the code which worked and the code which didn't work for discrepancies?
>>>
>>>Yes. They are exactly the same! And it only fails the first time it
>>>is executed, all other times work fine.
>>>
>>>>Marty
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Mark [mailto:i at dontgetlotsofspamanymore.net]
>>>>Sent: 17 May 2018 12:57
>>>>To: info-ingres at lists.planetingres.org<mailto:info-ingres at lists.planetingres.org>
>>>>Subject: Re: [Info-ingres] Weird problem in Ingres 10
>>>>
>>>>On Thu, 17 May 2018 11:21:37 +0000, Martin Bowes
>>>><martin.bowes at ndph.ox.ac.uk<mailto:martin.bowes at ndph.ox.ac.uk>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Twice...
>>>>>
>>>>>Once where it updates the data and once where it puts it back the way it was?
>>>>
>>>>No. The data is the same for each.
>>>>
>>>>>What do the Rowcount figures say on each statement?
>>>>
>>>>0.
>>>>
>>>>>Marty
>>>>>
>>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>>From: Mark [mailto:i at dontgetlotsofspamanymore.net]
>>>>>Sent: 17 May 2018 12:12
>>>>>To: info-ingres at lists.planetingres.org<mailto:info-ingres at lists.planetingres.org>
>>>>>Subject: Re: [Info-ingres] Weird problem in Ingres 10
>>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 16 May 2018 12:40:48 -0400, Karl and Betty Schendel
>>>>><schendel at kbcomputer.com<mailto:schendel at kbcomputer.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>SC930 tracing is server wide and runs until you stop it with set notrace sc930.
>>>>>>So you can connect to any database, do the set trace record '/some/ingres-writable/dir'
>>>>>>and the set trace point sc930, go to the trace record directory you gave it and
>>>>>>ensure that there's at least something there (should be one or more sessNNNNN files),
>>>>>>and then you can run your esql program until the fault happens.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You don't actually need to put the sc930 into the esql program unless you want to
>>>>>>do it that way.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Once you capture what you need to capture, set notrace point sc930 turns it off.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You'll need the trace point privilege, simplest is to do it as the installation owner
>>>>>>(user ingres, traditionally).
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks again. We now have traces but they don't help me. The traces
>>>>>include the SQL statement and the data but, pretty much, nothing else.
>>>>>
>>>>>The only notable thing I observed is that the data is traced twice for
>>>>>the failed transaction and only once for the successful ones.
>>>>>
>>>>>There are no error messages.
>>>>>
>>>>>>Karl
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On May 16, 2018, at 11:12 AM, Mark <i at dontgetlotsofspamanymore.net<mailto:i at dontgetlotsofspamanymore.net>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 16 May 2018 12:11:08 +0000, Martin Bowes
>>>>>>> <martin.bowes at ndph.ox.ac.uk<mailto:martin.bowes at ndph.ox.ac.uk>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just to expand on Karl's sc930...You may already know this...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To turn it on, make a recording directory...mkdir /full/path/to/directory'
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And then...
>>>>>>>> sql iidbdb << SQL_END
>>>>>>>> set trace record '/full/path/to/directory';
>>>>>>>> set trace point sc930 1;
>>>>>>>> \p\g
>>>>>>>> \q
>>>>>>>> SQL_END
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do I need to run this on the server account? I have implemented it
>>>>>>> currently in the embedded SQL of my program.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> FYI. The digit after the sc930 indicates a tracing level, 1 should be sufficient.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Run the errant query.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And turn off the sc930.
>>>>>>>> sql iidbdb << SQL_END
>>>>>>>> set trace point sc930 0;
>>>>>>>> \p\g
>>>>>>>> \q
>>>>>>>> SQL_END
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You can now access the recording directory and start scanning the files for any sign of life from your query.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Marty
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>> From: Karl and Betty Schendel [mailto:schendel at kbcomputer.com]
>>>>>>>> Sent: 16 May 2018 12:54
>>>>>>>> To: Ingres and related product discussion forum
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Info-ingres] Weird problem in Ingres 10
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On May 16, 2018, at 7:44 AM, Mark <i at dontgetlotsofspamanymore.net<mailto:i at dontgetlotsofspamanymore.net>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 15 May 2018 12:27:09 -0400, Karl and Betty Schendel
>>>>>>>>> <schendel at kbcomputer.com<mailto:schendel at kbcomputer.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's certainly not something I have heard of or seen before. Do you have any rules
>>>>>>>>>> defined on the relevant tables? Try enabling LOG_TRACE if the problem is
>>>>>>>>>> sufficiently predictable, or do a logdump after the problem occurs if it's not;
>>>>>>>>>> the idea being to try to see whether you actually got any PUT (insert) or
>>>>>>>>>> REP (replace) log records that were then rolled back, or whether the insert / update
>>>>>>>>>> was never executed at all.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> After enabling log_trace all I got was:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> LOG: SAVEPOINT Size written/reserved: 0/ 0 Flags:
>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So the insert/update isn't ever being executed. Either it's failing with some sort of
>>>>>>>> silent error, which would seem odd, or it's not reaching the backend at all, or
>>>>>>>> it's being pre-empted by a before rule. I think the next step would be to enable
>>>>>>>> sc930 tracing and see if the backend is getting the insert-update, and what
>>>>>>>> end-of-query status it's recording. There should be KB articles on enabling
>>>>>>>> SC930 tracing.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Info-ingres mailing list
>>>>>>>> Info-ingres at lists.planetingres.org<mailto:Info-ingres at lists.planetingres.org>
>>>>>>>> http://lists.planetingres.org/mailman/listinfo/info-ingres<http://lists.planetingres.org/mailman/listinfo/info-ingres>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> <insert witty sig here>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Info-ingres mailing list
>>>>>>> Info-ingres at lists.planetingres.org<mailto:Info-ingres at lists.planetingres.org>
>>>>>>> http://lists.planetingres.org/mailman/listinfo/info-ingres<http://lists.planetingres.org/mailman/listinfo/info-ingres>

--
<insert witty sig here>
_______________________________________________
Info-ingres mailing list
Info-ingres at lists.planetingres.org<mailto:Info-ingres at lists.planetingres.org>
http://lists.planetingres.org/mailman/listinfo/info-ingres<http://lists.planetingres.org/mailman/listinfo/info-ingres>
_______________________________________________
Info-ingres mailing list
Info-ingres at lists.planetingres.org<mailto:Info-ingres at lists.planetingres.org>
http://lists.planetingres.org/mailman/listinfo/info-ingres<http://lists.planetingres.org/mailman/listinfo/info-ingres>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.planetingres.org/pipermail/info-ingres/attachments/20180517/d490b727/attachment.html>

More information about the Info-ingres mailing list