[Info-ingres] Adding a constraint constrained my row estimate
Adrian Williamson
adrian.williamson at rationalcommerce.com
Mon Mar 12 12:21:09 UTC 2018
Hi Marty,
We found an issue with constraints and QEP some time ago.
Defining constraints seemed to destroy the performance of selected selects.
They tracked it down to fault in the greedy optimizer.
Bug 132120 (GENERIC)
Greedy enumeration omits useful indexes for query with outer join.
You don't seem to have the same thing but it does smell similar - if you
switch of greedy optimisation do you still get it?
Cheers
Adrian
From: info-ingres-bounces at lists.planetingres.org
<info-ingres-bounces at lists.planetingres.org> On Behalf Of Martin Bowes
Sent: 12 March 2018 11:44
To: info-ingres at lists.planetingres.org
Subject: [Info-ingres] Adding a constraint constrained my row estimate
Hi All,
On Ingres 11. 0.0 (a64.lnx/100) + p15255
Here is the QEP with no constraint between the tables.
QUERY PLAN 3,2, no timeout, of simple aggregate
aggregate expression -> count(*)
K Join(basket_id,
item_type)
Tups 641 Pages 1
D9 C2
/ \
Proj-rest basket_item
Sorted(basket_id) (x)
Tups 2 Pages 1 B-Tree(basket_id,
D4 C0 item_type)
Tups 1454547 Pages 22752
/
basket_main
(m)
B-Tree(basket_id)
Tups 3596 Pages 18
********************************************************************
--------------┐
│col1 │
+-------------+
********************************************************************
----------
| 0|
KJOIN
at 330
et 641 <--A little over, but ball park.
ad 6
ed 9
ac 0
ec 225
et 0
----------
/
And after adding a constraint for basket_item(basket_id) to refer to
basket_main(basket_id)
QUERY PLAN 3,2, no timeout, of simple aggregate
aggregate expression -> count(*)
K Join(basket_id,
item_type)
Tups 1 Pages 1
D8 C2
/ \
Proj-rest basket_item
Sorted(basket_id) (x)
Tups 2 Pages 1 B-Tree(basket_id,
D4 C0 item_type)
Tups 1454547 Pages 22752
/
basket_main
(m)
B-Tree(basket_id)
Tups 3596 Pages 18
********************************************************************
--------------┐
│col1 │
+-------------+
********************************************************************
----------
| 0|
KJOIN
at 330
et 1 <-- What the hell just happened?
ad 6
ed 8
ac 0
ec 154
et 0
----------
/
So why has a constraint altered my row estimate?
I tried this on 10.2 and the et stayed at the original estimate of 641.
Marty
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.planetingres.org/pipermail/info-ingres/attachments/20180312/237c0f74/attachment.html>
More information about the Info-ingres
mailing list